The Catholic Counter-Reformation in the 21st Century

Most recent articles

Our appeal before Rome  !

This question is of such import that it far exceeds the interests of our own selves. It concerns the universal Church and therefore falls within the jurisdiction of the Holy Father. It is his duty to make the discernment among the new teachings contained in the Acts of the Second Vatican Council, which his predecessors have refused to do for more than a half a century, leading to the ruin of the Church.

Does each member of the Catholic Counter-Reformation recognise the ordinary magisterium and the authority of the bishop on whom he depends  ? Would he be willing to work towards the evolution the community’s monastic rule  ?

In this final installment of Brother Bruno’s memorandum in response to the questionnaire of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he replies to the fourth and fifth question. Then he places our present state of apostasy of the Church in the context of Fatima. We are living through the final phases of Our Lady’s great Secret.

Does each member of the Catholic Counter-Reformation recognise the legitimate and uninterrupted Magisterium of the Popes, successors of the Apostle Peter  ?

After having presented his three Books of Accusation to the reigning Popes to obtain their judgement and the amendment of heresies, after having struggled against the drift towards schism, Father de Nantes set about to reconstruct the Church, the “City half in ruins” seen by the three seers in the vision of Fatima. He did this by formulating a “total” doctrine. In this instalment of Brother Bruno’s memorandum he gives a brief chronological review of this immense doctrinal labour. Then he answers the third question from the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: “Do you recognise the legitimate and uninterrupted Magisterium of the Popes, successors of the Apostle Peter?

Instituting canonical proceedings against the Pope

As provided for in the Code of Canon Law, Father de Nantes instituted canonical proceeding against Pope Paul VI and John Paul II as well as against the author of the Catechism of the Catholic Church by going to Rome each time to present his Books of Accusations to the proper Roman authorities. Three books, thus three trails! Where are the minutes of the proceedings of these three trials? What three judgements were handed down? When the Son of Man comes, will He find justice in Rome?

Does each member of the Catholic Counter-Reformation recognise the dogmatic and magisterial authority of the Second Vatican Council  ?

This is this second instalment of Brother Bruno’s memorandum in response to the questionnaire from the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Brother Bruno replies to the second question. “Do you recognise the dogmatic and Magisterial authority of the Second Vatican Council, in particular with regard to the doctrine of the Church, Divine Revelation, the liturgy and religious freedom?

Does each member of the Catholic Counter-Reformation profess the Catholic Faith  ?

This is this first instalment of Brother Bruno’s memorandum in response to the questionnaire from the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. After two preliminary observations, Brother Bruno replies to the first question. “Do you profess the Catholic Faith as taught in the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed and in all the Oecumenical Councils recognised by the Catholic Church?

At last  ! the long-awaited answer from Rome has come via a questionnaire from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

The letter from Archbishop Pontier of Marseille, President of the French Conference of Bishops; the questionnaire to be submitted to the Community of the Catholic Counter-Reformation; Brother Bruno of Jesus-Mary’s reply in the name of the Community and with its unanimous approval – at long last, our appeal to Rome is underway! Letter to Cardinal Ladaria Ferrer, Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.  (full-text version)

The faith of a new Athanasius

Athanasius Schneider, a Roman Catholic Bishop of Kazakhstan, is a member of the Canons Regular of the Holy Cross of Coimbra. He responded to the Document of Abu Dhabi, which Pope Francis and Imam At-Tayeb signed in the name of peace and the fight against violence. Brother Bruno complements his response by showing in the light of the Message of Our Lady of Fatima the consequences of the Holy Father’s denial in current events.

Pope Francis’ denial

It was with beating hearts that we saw Pope Francis fly off to visit the United Arab Emirates. What a disappointment it was! Under the pretext of “interreligious dialogue,” the Pope left his own religion in Rome. He did nothing more than adapt his discourse to Muslim “monotheism.”

A Heartfelt Cry

The imploring entreaty that Archbishop Viganò addressed to Archbishop McCarrick on January 13, 2019 is a purely supernatural act of theological faith, hope and charity inspired by a “prophetical” spirit in the style of Ezekiel calling on Jerusalem to repent of her “prostitutions” (Ez 16.)

At last, a bishop speaks  !

When Pope Francis was preparing to canonise Paul VI, the scandal denounced by Archbishop Viganò erupted on the feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, August 22, 2018. Since then, the former Apostolic Nuncio in Washington D.C., has delivered two “testimonies,” which complete his first one. To all those who are deeply appalled by them, we need to recall the words of the Child Jesus to Sister Lucy: “Have compassion on the Heart of your Most Holy Mother, covered with thorns, with which ungrateful men pierce It at every moment.”

Letter from a Phalangist friend to Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano

This moral profligacy that is defiling the Church today is only the symptom of much more serious doctrinal depravations. You are right to speak of longstanding “confusion and division.” Father de Nantes has submitted them several times to the infallible judgement of the Pope without ever receiving a reply. It is incumbent upon the Holy Father today to declare where truth or error lies. Only then will he be able to confirm his brothers in the faith and to face up to the formidable commitments of his office.

THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT FATIMA, VOLUME III
3.2. Towards the Consecration of the World to the Immaculate Heart of Mary

In 1938, Cardinal Pacelli had blessed at Rome the mosaic of the crowning of Our Lady, destined for the basilica of Fatima. What did he think of Our Lady’s Apparitions and messages on March 2, 1939, when he received the office of Supreme Pastor? Many indications suggested that he might receive Our Lady of Fatima’s requests more favourably than his predecessor.

THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT FATIMA, VOLUME III
3.1. “ Now Is the Hour of God’s Justice over the World  ! ”

The year 1939 saw the approval of the reparatory devotion. In 1940, Sister Lucy wrote her letter to Pope Pius XII and in 1941, her two most important Memoirs. She had perfectly fulfilled her mission. Now it was the hierarchy’s turn to act. Would the Secret be disclosed? Would Russia be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart? Everything depended on the Holy Father.

THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT FATIMA, VOLUME II
2.10. “ The War Predicted Is Imminent. It Will Be Horrible, Horrible  ! ”

Millions of people were able to watch the nocturnal aurora of January 25-26, 1938. Sister Lucy recognised the event predicted twenty years earlier by Our Lady in Her great Secret of July 13, 1917: “When you see a night illumined by an unknown light…” This spectacular atmospheric phenomenon was the sign of the divine chastisement that was imminent.

THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT FATIMA, VOLUME II
2.9. “ Russia Will Spread her Errors, Causing Wars and Persecutions… ”

In the years 1929-1931, everything depended on the Pope. If Russia had been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, neither the Second World War nor the explosive expansion of communism would have taken place. But since it did not happen, the chastisements began to take place, and misfortunes befell Christendom.

BLESSED CHARLES DE FOUCAULD
16. “ Set Apart for the Gospel ”

Presentation of the true spirit of Father de Foucauld and his spiritual advancement, which recapitulates the main stages of the life of Our Lord, thus presenting a marvellous illustration of the Gospel.

GEORGES DE NANTES The Mystical Doctor of the Catholic Faith

18. Neither Schism nor Heresy

Even though I cannot see it, I believe with the certainty of faith that the Church’s salvation resides today as yesterday in her Pastors. Even though temporarily sunk in error and in the sectarianism of their “Reformation,” grace nevertheless still subsists in them indefectibly, if not apparently, and is ready to spring to life, on the day appointed by God, for the salvation of all. The trouble may be very great and the danger to souls mortal but God does not wish to govern us except through the Hierarchy.